Investment strategy, withdrawals, and protections
Core Mechanics"We seek critique, not endorsement. Please be harsh. We can handle it."
Stability Accounts
Mechanics, Investment Strategy, and Protections
Core Concept
Stability Accounts are individually-owned investment accounts established at birth for every citizen, seeded with $25,000, and designed to grow to approximately $1.89 million by age 65. Unlike Social Security (a government promise), Stability Accounts are real assets owned by individuals—the government cannot access, modify, or default on what it doesn't control.
Account Structure
Initial Funding
Ownership Structure
Government access: Constitutionally prohibited—cannot be taxed, seized, or modified
Investment Strategy: DRIPS
Accounts are invested in DRIPS (Dividend Reinvestment Plans)—a diversified portfolio of dividend-paying stocks with automatic reinvestment.
Why DRIPS?
Long track record: Dividend aristocrats have outperformed market over 50+ year periods
Portfolio Construction
Management: Independent board, not government—similar to Federal Reserve structure
Growth Projections
Note: Even conservative scenario far exceeds average American's retirement savings ($87K)
Withdrawal Rules
Permitted Uses (Before 65)
Education: College, vocational training, professional development, lifelong learning
Retirement Access (65+)
No required distributions: Unlike 401(k), no forced withdrawals—can leave to grow
Healthcare Deduction Mechanism
Universal coverage funded: Healthcare costs deducted from account growth (not principal)
Catastrophic protection: Major illness doesn't wipe out account—caps protect floor
Protections
Constitutional Protection
Accounts established as constitutional property right
Government cannot access, tax, or modify accounts
Amendment required to change structure—high barrier
Key distinction from Social Security: SS benefits can be changed by Congress anytime. Accounts cannot.
Market Crash Protection
Historical resilience: No 65-year period in US history has lost money in diversified equities
Floor protection: Minimum guaranteed benefit if market underperforms catastrophically
Fraud/Mismanagement Protection
Transition for Existing Adults
Near-retirees (55-64): Choice: stay in old system or transition with pro-rated seed
Workers (25-54): Transition to accounts with age-adjusted seed (less time to compound)
Pro-rating formula: Seed adjusted so expected retirement value is comparable across cohorts
Comparison: Stability Accounts vs. Alternatives
vs. Social Security
vs. 401(k)
vs. UBI (Universal Basic Income)
Discussion Questions
Is 7% return assumption reasonable? What if lower?
How do we prevent early-access abuse while allowing legitimate use?
What governance structure best protects independence?
How do transition-generation accounts avoid resentment?
What happens if someone emigrates? Immigrates?
Should investment choices be individual or collective?
Note: Stability Accounts are the cornerstone of AIP—transforming citizens from dependent beneficiaries into capital owners. The mechanics here are designed for robustness, but validators are invited to identify vulnerabilities.